The Preliminary-Hearing Swindle: Q&A With Attorney And Author, Michael D. Cicchini

Copied!
Michael D. Cicchini – Attorney And Author
(Submitted Photo)

Kenosha criminal defense attorney Michael Cicchini recently had his new article, “The Preliminary-Hearing Swindle: A Crime Against Procedure,” accepted for publication by the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review.  We asked him about his article, and whether the preliminary hearing could have prevented the bogus prosecution of Kenosha college student Marissa Chon.

Paid Advertisement

Q:  Near the beginning of your article on preliminary hearings, you quote Ambrose Bierce.  Who is he and what did he say?

Paid Advertisement

I’m glad you noticed that!  Ambrose Bierce was a brilliant newspaper editor and author in the late 1800s and early 1900s.  He was famously cynical about the American legal system.  He defined litigation as “a machine which you go into as a pig and come out of as a sausage.”  And he described a litigant as “a person about to give up his skin for the hope of retaining his bones.”  I think Bierce would have been especially sympathetic toward the modern criminal defendant, a litigant who is dragged into the machinery against their will, squealing every step of the way.

Paid Advertisement

Q:  Tell me about the preliminary hearing part of the machinery.  What is the prelim supposed to accomplish?

Paid Advertisement

The prelim is an adversarial, evidentiary hearing in felony cases only.  It is supposed to serve as a check on prosecutorial power.  Felonies are so serious that we don’t trust prosecutorial judgment; there is supposed to be a check, a screening mechanism to weed out the garbage cases.  The case law is riddled with grandiose pronouncements about the prelim.  My favorite is that the prelim “prevents hasty, malicious, improvident, and oppressive prosecutions.”  It is supposed to save the defendant from the life-ruining cost and anxiety of being prosecuted for a felony when the charge isn’t warranted.  It is supposed to save the taxpayers from the expense of clogging up the system with baseless prosecutions.  To return to Bierce’s description, the prelim is supposed to be the brake on the litigation machine.

Paid Advertisement

Q:  In your article you say that the prelim has been eliminated. They happen every morning.  What do you mean?

Paid Advertisement

In Kenosha, we still schedule the prelim, but the adversarial, evidentiary hearing with witnesses has been replaced by a mere reading of the criminal complaint.  The prosecutor has a person, who is completely uninvolved in the case, read and memorize the prosecutor’s complaint.  That person then takes the witness stand and recites what the prosecutor wrote in it.  And that’s the entire prelim.  But as I explain in the article, that violates statutes, case law, and sometimes even the constitution.  It’s also one of the most absurd things I’ve ever seen.  The defense lawyer and magistrate have already read the complaint, so why are we having this uninvolved person memorize it and try to tell us what’s in it?  Not only have we read it, be we all have the document right in front of us!  The whole thing is a form-over-substance ploy designed to swindle the defendant out of his prelim—hence my article’s title.  I think the great Ambrose Bierce, if he were alive today, would approve of it.

Paid Advertisement

Q:  Are they doing that in other Wisconsin counties as well? 

Paid Advertisement

Yes, but some counties are more honest about it.  They basically say, Look, we’re going to take away your prelim, and we’re not going to bother having a person memorize the complaint and then talk about it from the witness stand.  We’re all capable of reading, so we’re just going to move the complaint into the record.  In my opinion, somewhat paradoxically, taking the swindle this one step further has a perverse sort of honesty about it.  They’re taking away the prelim, yes, but they’re telling you what they’re doing.  There’s no pretending, and there’s no illusion of having a prelim—no façade.

Q:  That’s a lot to take in.  What’s the bottom line to all of this?

It is a lot.  But the bottom line is this.  In either version of the swindle, instead of checking prosecutorial power, the judiciary now bows down to it and blindly accepts whatever the prosecutor wrote in the complaint.  The practical result is that more junk cases are clogging up the courts’ calendars.  There are also more people in jail or on felony bail who shouldn’t be.  This ruins lives, destroys personal finances, and costs a lot of taxpayer money.  These are the precise things that the prelim was designed to prevent.

Q: Do you think anyone will change this and restore the prelim?

One of our state senators has taken an interest in my article, and he was surprised to learn how the courts are butchering the statutes that the legislature has passed.  He is looking into some things, and hopefully some good comes of that, but I don’t know.  As far as the courts, the recently-retired judge Bruce Schroeder, who presided over the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, was absolutely disgusted by the preliminary-hearing swindle.  There were times when he wouldn’t stand for this nonsense.  But he’s gone, and the swindle is now firmly ingrained.  It is so ingrained that I think newer Wisconsin lawyers would be shocked to learn how the prelim is supposed to work, did work, and can work.  But in other states, the hearing still does its job of weeding out bunk cases.

Q:  I know you like the Frank Carson case.  Is that what you’re referring to? 

Yes, that’s my favorite example!  In California v. Frank Carson, some really goofy prosecutors convinced themselves that criminal defense attorney Frank Carson enlisted his wife, his daughter, two local business owners, and three police officers to murder a petty scrap metal thief.  The prosecutors charged everyone—even the cops!  Because of the number of defendants, the prelim actually took multiple hearings over several months to complete.  But after hearing the evidence, the judge dismissed the murder charge for some defendants and dismissed entire cases for others.  Frank Carson didn’t get his case dismissed, but the evidence at the prelim was so weak that the judge reduced his high cash bail to a signature bond and he was released from custody on the spot.  Carson was then fully acquitted at trial.

Q:  Could the prelim have helped Marissa Chon, the young college student who was falsely accused and prosecuted for driving drunk and crashing a car in Kenosha? 

Yes, I read that story on KCE, you’ll be happy to know. Imagine if, instead of reading the complaint at the prelim, the responding officers testified about their investigation. Eyewitness might even be called to the stand. And the defense would get to cross-examine everyone. Then imagine that one of the police officers testifies, as he said during the investigation, There’s no way that Chon was driving the car!  Now, we shouldn’t invoke Bierce’s imagery of pigs being turned into sausages for a case involving such a nice young lady, but you get the picture. The felony prosecution had disastrous effects on her and her family. A proper prelim could have stopped that case dead in its tracks. 

Q:  Thanks for discussing your new article and the preliminary hearing.

Thank you for taking an interest in this.  As a pessimist and a cynic, I don’t have great hope that things will change.  But I think that, at the very least, the people of Wisconsin should know what their public servants are up to.

You can find the pre-publication draft of Cicchini’s article, “The Preliminary-Hearing Swindle: A Crime Against Procedure,” on his website, here.  You can find Cicchini’s other articles on criminal procedure on the articles page of his website, here.

Author

Copied!
LATEST NEWS

Village Administrator Lawyers Up Amid DNR Wetland Investigation

Salem Lakes, Wis. — The Village of Salem Lakes’ top administrator is under scrutiny after the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) launched an investigation into potential illegal wetland disturbances on municipal property. The property in question is zoned C1. Lowland Resource Conservancy (C1) zoning is intended to prevent the destruction of valuable natural resources, including wetlands, shorelands, and areas subject to flooding. This is among the most restrictive zoning in the County. Cassandra Hiller, the

Read More »

Kenosha Alderman Accused of “Playing Cop” Again, Raising Concerns Over Overreach: Video

Kenosha, Wis. – Alderman Rollin Pizzala is facing renewed scrutiny after being spotted once again engaging in actions that appear to be outside the scope of his duties as a city legislator. On Thursday afternoon, a tip-off to Kenosha County Eye (KCE) reported Pizzala actively patrolling the 43rd Avenue neighborhood north of 60th Street, raising concerns among residents about his actions. Pizzala was reportedly “inspecting” properties in the area for code violations, such as property maintenance,

Read More »
MORE TOP STORIES

Racine Officer Shoots Armed Suspect During Home Invasion: Investigation Underway

Racine, Wis. — An officer with the Racine Police Department shot and injured a suspect during a tense encounter inside a residence Tuesday night following a reported armed home invasion. The incident occurred in the 1100 block of Hamilton Street and has triggered an outside investigation, officials confirmed. According to a news release from the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Office, Racine officers responded to the scene on April 22 after receiving reports of a home invasion involving

Read More »

Kenosha Man Accused of Strangling Girlfriend, Causing Severe Facial Injury

Kenosha, Wis. — A 56-year-old Kenosha man is facing multiple criminal charges after allegedly assaulting his live-in girlfriend, choking her and striking her in the face hard enough to require stitches and cause temporary vision loss. Allen S. Meyer was charged in Kenosha County Circuit Court with substantial battery, strangulation and suffocation, and disorderly conduct — all with domestic abuse enhancers. The alleged attack occurred on March 21 at Meyer’s upper unit residence on 17th Avenue.

Read More »

Kenosha Woman Charged Again for Stealing Family’s Car While Out on Bail for Doing the Same

Kenosha, Wis. – A 36-year-old Kenosha woman remains in the county jail on a $7,500 cash bail after being charged with stealing her daughter’s car over the weekend—despite already being out on bail for a similar car theft involving her own mother just months earlier. Kristy R. Delaney now faces a total of ten new charges in a case filed Monday, including five felony counts of bail jumping, misdemeanor bail jumping, misdemeanor theft, operating while revoked,

Read More »

Kenosha Woman Accused of Tearing Sister’s Ear in Violent Fight

Kenosha, Wis. — A 23-year-old Kenosha woman is facing felony charges after allegedly assaulting her sister during a domestic dispute, less than two years after a similar case against her was dropped by the previous district attorney’s office. Katie M. Imbrogno has been charged in Kenosha County Circuit Court with one count of Substantial Battery – Domestic Abuse, a Class I felony, and one count of Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Abuse, a Class B misdemeanor. If

Read More »

$50,000 Bail Set for Kenosha Man Accused of Distributing Child Pornography

Kenosha, Wis. — A Kenosha man is being held in the Kenosha County Jail on serious felony charges after investigators say he shared a graphic image involving a young child over social media. Daniel D. Pichardo-Vilchis, 39, was arrested April 16 following an investigation by the Kenosha Police Department and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). He appeared in court last week for an initial appearance, where Court Commissioner William Michel ordered a

Read More »

Kenosha Man Jailed After Additional Child Porn Charges Filed

Kenosha, Wis. — A Kenosha man is facing serious new criminal charges after being re-arrested last week in connection with a growing child pornography case. Hector A. Tot-Cuc, 25, was first charged on March 31, 2025, with two counts of possession of child pornography. He was released on $10,000 cash bail the following day. But on April 16, at 9:40 a.m., Tot-Cuc was taken back into custody after new evidence led prosecutors to file five additional

Read More »

Teen Avoids Adult Court After Bringing Loaded Gun to Indian Trail

Kenosha, Wis. — In a decision that’s raising eyebrows across the community, Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Chad Kerkman (D) on Friday rejected a request from prosecutors to waive 16-year-old Jaheem Wright into adult court, allowing the teen who brought a loaded gun to school and made threats to be sentenced in juvenile court instead. Wright, who terrified students and staff at Indian Trail High School in December, took a plea deal and pleaded guilty to

Read More »

Counselor on Leave Amid Allegations at Westosha Central High School; Parents Demand Transparency

Paddock Lake, Wis. — A counselor at Westosha Central High School is currently on leave, and parents are once again demanding transparency from school leadership. Kenosha County Eye has confirmed through multiple sources that the counselor is accused of inappropriate communication with a student. According to individuals familiar with the situation, the counselor allegedly used his or her personal cellphone to communicate with a student and is also believed to have given the student a ride

Read More »

Kenosha Cop Sues City, Claims Anti-Gay Discrimination Over Missed Promotion

Kenosha, Wis. — A longtime Kenosha police officer who was once accused—but never charged—of rape has filed a federal lawsuit claiming the city and its police chiefs passed him over for promotion because he is gay. Officer Pep Moretti, who has worked for the Kenosha Police Department since 2009, filed the Title VII discrimination lawsuit in late March against the City of Kenosha, former Chief Eric Larsen, and current Chief Patrick Patton. In his complaint, Moretti

Read More »

Wilmot High School Quiz on Trump Tariffs Draws Parental Criticism

Kenosha, Wis. — Some Wilmot Union High School parents are speaking out this week, accusing a 10th grade World History teacher of pushing a politically biased message in the classroom. The criticism centers on a quiz that students were given concerning the economic impacts of former President Donald Trump’s tariff policies — a quiz many say unfairly portrays Trump in a negative light. The assignment, titled “The Consequences of Black Friday,” includes four questions directly targeting

Read More »
Categories
Archives
Authors

17 Responses

  1. What he fails to mention is that, if, a county chooses to do preliminary hearings in such a manner (which I disagree with), the information contained on the complaint is still based off of officer’s reports. The DA office may summarize several different officer’s reports, depending on the case. The reason a representative of the agency or the district attorney office may handle all the prelims is a cost cutting measure. No matter how the complaints are written- there still has to be the presence of probable cause and I find it difficult to believe that even a court commissioner cannot sniff out some sort of malfeasance, if there were one.
    How about for once, some of these defense attorneys quit wasting our time and money and let their people plead guilty right off the bat. They sure don’t complain with all the BS plea deals and ‘dismissed and read in’ nonsense their clients get. Let’s level the playing field here.

    2
    1
    1. Your reply fails too, as it doesn’t address the issue of being able to question victims in person during the preliminary if it’s all being done on paper.

    2. Even if there is probable cause in a criminal complaint the level of probable cause to bindover a case at a preliminary hearing is supposed to be higher.

    3. I agree with Fat Boy. We shouldn’t do anything to help these criminals. It is obvious they did something wrong.. They were arrested. We just need to lock these people up. THE HELL WITH THEIR RIGHTS!

      “Whiskey for my men, beer for our horses.”

    4. Plea deals are bullshit too for a guy being charged with multiple bullshit charges in Kenosha county because the court scares people into pleading guilty to the lesser charges normally to dismiss the more serious and therefore some people plea guilty to lesser charges that they aren’t even guilty of in fear of being jailed over the bigger ones!!! It’s all bullshit! Our system sucks ass!!! Just look at what our crooked piece of shit dumocratic weaponized system is trying to do to Trump! Fuck the system!

  2. “Fat Kid,” thanks for reading and commenting. Your point is right that there has to be probable cause (PC) in the complaint. But the law is clear that “The degree of
    probable cause required for a bindover [after a prelim] is greater than that required to support a criminal complaint.” The main difference comes down to Anonymous’s point: prelims require live witnesses with “personal knowledge” of the case who are then subject to cross-examination. I cover this in depth in the article, though we couldn’t get into everything in the short Q&A with Kevin. If your time is limited — as is the case with most of us — I would direct you to parts II and IV of the article for a more detailed discussion of this.

    As for letting people plead guilty right off the bat, that isn’t possible. A commissioner can’t take a guilty plea at the initial appearance or even at the arraignment. And as a practical matter, all of the evidence of innocence, the mitigating evidence, etc., is found in the “discovery materials.” Unfortunately, Wisconsin law allows prosecutors to keep this evidence from the defense until AFTER the preliminary hearing, which is what they do as a matter of practice. (Other states make sure defense lawyers get discovery BEFORE the prelim, and also get a meaningful prelim with live police-officer witnesses, if not the complaining witness.) As far as the level of the playing field, I’ve researched the law of most if not all states, and Wisconsin is the most pro-prosecutor state I’ve seen with regard to prelims (and many other areas of law, actually).

    Thank you both — “Fat Kid” and “Anonymous” — for reading and commenting. And thanks, Kevin, for doing the Q&A on my article.

  3. Defendants can waive their right to a preliminary hearing…. but most don’t know that unless informed by the D.A.s office before court (as most people utilize their office initially for representation).

    Most judges and employees of the DAs office love the show of going to court and dragging cases out. They are definitely not overworked.

  4. Atty. Cicchini makes a number of valid points. The preliminary hearing was supposed to be a check on improvident arrests and prosecutions but has been diluted, especially in Kenosha County, to the point of ridiculousness.

    The culprit was a legislative amendment allowing widespread use of hearsay at a preliminary hearing. Now, there are some legitimate reasons why hearsay makes sense in some cases at a preliminary hearing. Is it really necessary for some employee of an insurance company in Ohio to drive to Kenosha to say that the insurance company paid out $50,000 in damages in a particular case to establish the amount of loss at the prelim? However, in almost all cases, the district attorney’s office under the current administration has frustrated justice by using hearsay in every preliminary hearing — sometimes botching cases because of it. These prosecutors have forgotten that their DUTY is to ensure JUSTICE and the district attorney’s office management has in large measure observed that in the breach.

    First, let’s discuss hearsay. Prosecutors and the police officer testifying sometimes forget that while hearsay may be used it must be RELIABLE hearsay. Two of the questions in determining probable cause is (1) Who says so?; and (2) Why should they be believed? Often that’s a no-brainer. Like when the victim knew the defendant and made a statement based on what the victim personally saw: “Kevin stood in front of me, pulled out a blue steel revolver and told me to ‘hand over the money’ so I took the cash that was in my pocket and handed it to him.” In this case quoting what the victim said established the foundation for why he should be believed.

    But sometimes criminal complaints include hearsay that doesn’t have that foundation and some commissioners have bounced cases because the officer testifying didn’t tie up the loose ends. They could have gone beyond the complaint to actually read the reports and statements and quote them. The prosecutor could have added that evidence. But poor training and case management has lead to dismissal of cases (which can be refiled if there is additional evidence) when the hearsay wasn’t reliable.

    There is a larger problem and that is the current practice of the district attorney’s office costs taxpayer money and actually frustrates justice. When the prosecutors brought in the essential witnesses and spoke to them face-to-face they discovered the strengths and weaknesses of the case. Even if the preliminary hearing was waived, that knowledge was helpful in resolving cases. If the prosecution had a great case and there was a preliminary hearing defendants and their attorneys would quickly find that out and usually there would be no trial. Or, if the case was shaky that also would become evident. The prosecution at that point could have further investigation to fill in the blanks or else back down. In these situations the preliminary hearing fulfilled the function of case screening.

    That essential case screening function has been reduced to ridiculousness by the district attorney’s office and I hope that the next DA will take this to heart and understand that having the essential witnesses available for a preliminary hearing fulfills many important purposes (including the requirement for victim consultation).

  5. Cops are human. They can make mistakes. Two preliminary hearings were bounced because the court officer testifying from the complaint messed up. Afterward, the deputy sheriff in the county case asked for an explanation of what he did wrong so that he wouldn’t make the mistake again. The KPD detective just left the courtroom in a snit.

    1. Mike Chicchini graduated #1 in our law school class 24 years ago. Brilliant mind. Humble guy. We all knew he would do great things. I bet he might even be embarrassed that I mentioned this fact, but it IS worth mentioning.

    2. Mike Chicchini graduated #1 in our law school class 24 years ago. Brilliant mind. Humble guy. We all knew he would do great things. I bet he might even be embarrassed that I mentioned this fact, but it IS worth mentioning.

  6. Plea deals are bullshit too for a guy being charged with multiple bullshit charges in Kenosha county because the court scares people into pleading guilty to the lesser charges normally to dismiss the more serious and therefore some people plea guilty to lesser charges that they aren’t even guilty of in fear of being jailed over the bigger ones!!! It’s all bullshit! Our system sucks ass!!! Just look at what our crooked piece of shit dumocratic weaponized system is trying to do to Trump! Fuck the system! Thank you Mr. Cicchini for all you do and for the enlightening articles that you write and publish!!!

  7. This article is great. If there are charges brought against someone, say simply an accusation. No proof only he said she said and there’s no preliminary hearing than a defendant just gets locked up or a high bond due to a commissioners fear of being persecuted by the public. Smathers, the Kenosha ADA takes this to a whole new level. The max all the way. Charge no matter what. This is ridiculous. make the accuser face the court with their accusations like its supposed to be done.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST NEWS
Categories
Archives
Authors

Subscribe to updates

Get notified of new articles. We'll never share your email address.