Idaho and Wisconsin: A Tale of Two Preliminary Hearings

Copied!

Guest post by criminal defense attorney Michael D. Cicchini

Paid Advertisement

In the Idaho quadruple homicide case, defendant Bryan Kohberger is accused of murdering University of Idaho students Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves, and Madison Mogen.  The defense waived the right to a timely preliminary hearing (14 days in Idaho) and set the hearing in June so it has enough time to go through all of the evidence.  The judge cleared five days on the calendar for the hearing itself.  This indicates that the defense gets the discovery materials (e.g., police reports, witness statements, etc.) before the prelim and the state has to call actual witnesses at the evidentiary hearing in order to establish probable cause.

Paid Advertisement

By comparison, in Wisconsin, the courts at all levels of the system have managed to super-legislate from the bench; they have somehow turned an evidentiary hearing, which was designed to prevent improvident prosecutions, into a prosecutorial weapon for charging anything and everything without probable cause and, certainly, without the presentation of any evidence.

Paid Advertisement

What do I mean?  Well, if pre-hearing discovery and actual witnesses are the hallmark of Idaho’s preliminary hearing, then these are the hallmarks of Wisconsin’s preliminary hearing:

Paid Advertisement

1.                  No pre-hearing discovery whatsoever.  (See pp. 499-504.)  The defense is kept in the dark and isn’t even entitled to police reports before the hearing.  And at the hearing itself, prosecutors have even dreamed-up a new objection whenever the defense asks a question of a witness that might produce some interesting information.  They pipe up, with a sense of urgency in their voice, “Objection, discovery!”  As I’ve pointed out to numerous court commissioners, “discovery” is not a proper objection.  No matter, the objection is nearly always sustained and the line of questioning is stopped dead in its tracks.  Ignorance, apparently, is the goal. 

Paid Advertisement

2.                 Witnesses without any knowledge of the case whatsoever (See pp. 493-499.)  In Wisconsin, prosecutors don’t have to call actual witnesses.  Instead, they call a “reader”—a law enforcement agent assigned to the courtroom for the day who had nothing whatsoever to do with the investigation of the case.  This reader reads and tries to memorize the criminal complaint—a document drafted by the prosecutor’s office—and then answers questions about it on the witness stand.  In other words, the state’s “evidence” at the prelim consists of a cop (with no personal knowledge of the case) saying that a prosecutor (who drafted the complaint) said that an investigating officer said that an informant or other witness said that the defendant said or did something.  Probable cause established!  Hearing over.  Thanks for playing.  I kid you not, dear reader.  

Paid Advertisement

3.                 Defense witnesses need not apply!  (See pp. 504-506.)   In order to prevent the defense from learning anything about the case, courts may also prohibit the defense from calling its own witnesses with personal knowledge of what allegedly happened.  And commissioners and judges deny defendants this right despite the clear, plain statute allowing—guess what?—the defense to call witnesses!  How can this happen?  Again, super-legislation from the bench at all levels of the court system starting with the court commissioner, then the trial court judge, then the appellate court, then the state’s high court.  Read the three pages in the above link to learn the logical and legal errors the courts commit when denying defendants their statutory right to present evidence at the hearing.

Paid Advertisement

4.                 The preliminary hearing is a prosecutorial weapon to add charges (See pp. 506-511.)  In Wisconsin, the preliminary hearing now benefits the prosecutor, not the defense.  Although the hearing is meant to provide felony defendants with additional protections compared with defendants charged with mere misdemeanors, prosecutors use the courts’ super-legislation to add charges without any probable cause in the hearing testimony or even the complaint!  Once again, this deplorable, pro-state, intellectually hollow tactic not only violates the purpose of the hearing, but also directly contradicts the statute which requires dismissal of all counts for which there was no probable cause!  Read the above pages to learn the intricate details.  Fair warning: it’s like watching the metaphorical sausage being made.

Paid Advertisement

Although they’re violating law, logic, reason, and commonsense—and effectively eliminating an important part of criminal procedure in the process—you have to give these government agents points for sneaky efficiency.  I’m quoting myself here, but, “in today’s assembly-line approach to criminal law, prosecutors and judges have developed many ways to bypass this procedural safeguard [the preliminary hearing] and keep the criminal justice machinery humming along.”  It’s a volume business!

[This post has been cross-posted on The Legal Watchdog blog.]

Author

Copied!
LATEST NEWS

Kenosha CNA Accused of Assaulting Elderly Resident at Care Facility

Kenosha, Wis. — A Kenosha woman stands accused of abusing a 73-year-old man at a local care facility where she worked, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. Jahnix A. Medina, 27, was charged with one count of physical abuse of an elder person, intentionally causing bodily harm, a Class H felony. If convicted, she faces up to six years in prison, a $10,000 fine, or both. According to the complaint, officers

Read More »

Maine Man Accused of Violent Robbery in Kenosha; Bail Set at $10,000

Kenosha, Wis. — A Maine man is facing felony charges in Kenosha County after allegedly assaulting a woman and robbing her of a necklace in a violent altercation last fall. On Wednesday, Court Commissioner William Michel II set bail at $10,000 cash for Lewis A. Covington, 32, who is charged with robbery with use of force and substantial battery—both with domestic abuse enhancers. According to the criminal complaint, the incident occurred on October 12, 2024, when

Read More »
MORE TOP STORIES

Village Administrator Lawyers Up Amid DNR Wetland Investigation

Salem Lakes, Wis. — The Village of Salem Lakes’ top administrator is under scrutiny after the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) launched an investigation into potential illegal wetland disturbances on municipal property. The property in question is zoned C1. Lowland Resource Conservancy (C1) zoning is intended to prevent the destruction of valuable natural resources, including wetlands, shorelands, and areas subject to flooding. This is among the most restrictive zoning in the County. Cassandra Hiller, the

Read More »

Kenosha Alderman Accused of “Playing Cop” Again, Raising Concerns Over Overreach: Video

Kenosha, Wis. – Alderman Rollin Pizzala is facing renewed scrutiny after being spotted once again engaging in actions that appear to be outside the scope of his duties as a city legislator. On Thursday afternoon, a tip-off to Kenosha County Eye (KCE) reported Pizzala actively patrolling the 43rd Avenue neighborhood north of 60th Street, raising concerns among residents about his actions. Pizzala was reportedly “inspecting” properties in the area for code violations, such as property maintenance,

Read More »

Racine Officer Shoots Armed Suspect During Home Invasion: Investigation Underway

Racine, Wis. — An officer with the Racine Police Department shot and injured a suspect during a tense encounter inside a residence Tuesday night following a reported armed home invasion. The incident occurred in the 1100 block of Hamilton Street and has triggered an outside investigation, officials confirmed. According to a news release from the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Office, Racine officers responded to the scene on April 22 after receiving reports of a home invasion involving

Read More »

Kenosha Man Accused of Strangling Girlfriend, Causing Severe Facial Injury

Kenosha, Wis. — A 56-year-old Kenosha man is facing multiple criminal charges after allegedly assaulting his live-in girlfriend, choking her and striking her in the face hard enough to require stitches and cause temporary vision loss. Allen S. Meyer was charged in Kenosha County Circuit Court with substantial battery, strangulation and suffocation, and disorderly conduct — all with domestic abuse enhancers. The alleged attack occurred on March 21 at Meyer’s upper unit residence on 17th Avenue.

Read More »

Kenosha Woman Charged Again for Stealing Family’s Car While Out on Bail for Doing the Same

Kenosha, Wis. – A 36-year-old Kenosha woman remains in the county jail on a $7,500 cash bail after being charged with stealing her daughter’s car over the weekend—despite already being out on bail for a similar car theft involving her own mother just months earlier. Kristy R. Delaney now faces a total of ten new charges in a case filed Monday, including five felony counts of bail jumping, misdemeanor bail jumping, misdemeanor theft, operating while revoked,

Read More »

Kenosha Woman Accused of Tearing Sister’s Ear in Violent Fight

Kenosha, Wis. — A 23-year-old Kenosha woman is facing felony charges after allegedly assaulting her sister during a domestic dispute, less than two years after a similar case against her was dropped by the previous district attorney’s office. Katie M. Imbrogno has been charged in Kenosha County Circuit Court with one count of Substantial Battery – Domestic Abuse, a Class I felony, and one count of Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Abuse, a Class B misdemeanor. If

Read More »

$50,000 Bail Set for Kenosha Man Accused of Distributing Child Pornography

Kenosha, Wis. — A Kenosha man is being held in the Kenosha County Jail on serious felony charges after investigators say he shared a graphic image involving a young child over social media. Daniel D. Pichardo-Vilchis, 39, was arrested April 16 following an investigation by the Kenosha Police Department and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). He appeared in court last week for an initial appearance, where Court Commissioner William Michel ordered a

Read More »

Kenosha Man Jailed After Additional Child Porn Charges Filed

Kenosha, Wis. — A Kenosha man is facing serious new criminal charges after being re-arrested last week in connection with a growing child pornography case. Hector A. Tot-Cuc, 25, was first charged on March 31, 2025, with two counts of possession of child pornography. He was released on $10,000 cash bail the following day. But on April 16, at 9:40 a.m., Tot-Cuc was taken back into custody after new evidence led prosecutors to file five additional

Read More »

Teen Avoids Adult Court After Bringing Loaded Gun to Indian Trail

Kenosha, Wis. — In a decision that’s raising eyebrows across the community, Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Chad Kerkman (D) on Friday rejected a request from prosecutors to waive 16-year-old Jaheem Wright into adult court, allowing the teen who brought a loaded gun to school and made threats to be sentenced in juvenile court instead. Wright, who terrified students and staff at Indian Trail High School in December, took a plea deal and pleaded guilty to

Read More »

Counselor on Leave Amid Allegations at Westosha Central High School; Parents Demand Transparency

Paddock Lake, Wis. — A counselor at Westosha Central High School is currently on leave, and parents are once again demanding transparency from school leadership. Kenosha County Eye has confirmed through multiple sources that the counselor is accused of inappropriate communication with a student. According to individuals familiar with the situation, the counselor allegedly used his or her personal cellphone to communicate with a student and is also believed to have given the student a ride

Read More »
Categories
Archives
Authors

6 Responses

  1. What a great piece. Thank you for the KCE for bring it to us. However, much of it will be lost on the majority of visitors to this site who blindly “back the badge.” People should understand that when you do not protect the rights of criminal defendants, you have the same system as North Korea. Anyone can find themselves in the sites of corrupt law enforcement. No one can say with certainty that it would never happen to them.

  2. Interesting article by Mr. Cicchini. A lot of what and, frankly, some chaff, too, as his recitation of Wisconsin law is not only skewed but occasionally inaccurate. Quibbling about what he got wrong would be counterproductive because what he got right is even more significant than what Mr. Cicchini wrote. So I’ll pick just one nit.

    The preliminary hearing is not a mini-trial or preliminary trial in Wisconsin. It is a screening device and thus the among of evidence necessary to give the green light for a prosecution to proceed is much less than needed for a conviction. With that out of the way the problem (well, one of the problems) in Kenosha County is that the district attorney’s office has chosen to reduce preliminary hearings to an almost meaningless waste of time and money that frustrates justice worse that what Mr. Cicchini laments.

    Remember that I said that preliminary hearings aren’t supposed to be mini-trials? Despite what the law reads (and the changes over the years) to be an effective screening device they are kinda, sorta mini-trials. Why? Because that’s how to separate the marginal cases from those with much more merit. How so? The answer begins with understanding how charges come about.

    When police investigate a crime they can either make an arrest and refer the case to the district attorney for prosecution or sometimes they will just refer the case without keeping the suspect in custody. Either way in most situations the district attorney is making a charging decision based on police reports and witness statements with no meaningful chance (if any) to independently evaluate the quality of the case.

    As a practical matter preliminary hearings were an opportunity for both the prosecutor and defense attorney to “kick the tires” of the case. If the witnesses, especially the victim, were subpoenaed for the preliminary hearing the prosecutor would discuss the case with them and could determine if what was in the reports and witness statements squared with what would be their testimony. Often victims know defendants and had insights about the case and the people involved that isn’t in the police reports. Sometimes this process showed the holes in the case and sometimes the case was actually better than it may have initially seemed.

    Truth is most preliminary hearings wound up being waived by defendants but the presence of the key witnesses in the case at the preliminary hearing was helpful. Occasionally defense attorneys would have their own conversations with the witnesses and could size up the case and then recommend that their clients waive the hearing. Other times even though cross-examination was limited having the witnesses on the stand gave both attorneys a view of the evidence and how the witnesses would hold up at a trial. Many times after a preliminary hearing defense attorneys would come to the conclusion that the prosecution had a good case and attempt to settle it short of trial. Similarly prosecutors would see where a case was weak. A lot of cases were settled this way and scarce resources (and money) saved for the defendants and cases requiring a trial.

    Then the legislature expanded the law to broaden the acceptable use of hearsay testimony at a preliminary hearing. The truth is that some witnesses who were called to testify at a preliminary hearing added nothing meaningful. Let’s say the case was a felony level criminal damage to property case where the amount of damage is relevant to the charge and that American Family Insurance paid out $25,000 to fix the damage. Was it really necessary for someone from American Family to drive from Madison to Kenosha just to say that they paid out $25,000 to fix the damage when all that witness knows is that the company cut a check for $25,000 on that claim? 99% of the time the answer would be a solid “no” and hearsay would be an utterly acceptable conservation of time and cost at a preliminary hearing.

    The Kenosha County District Attorney’s office took this too far. Now most preliminary hearings don’t have witnesses subpoenaed to the courtroom but rather a police officer reads the criminal complaint. Almost always the officer has zero personal knowledge of the case and both the prosecutor and defense attorney have no chance to meet and hear from the people who do. The district attorney’s office doesn’t have the face-to-face ability to size up the witnesses and cases wind up on the trial calendar without that early vetting. Defense attorneys have a tougher time determining whether to go to trial or to settle a case that maybe if they heard some first hand testimony they’d be convinced their client had little chance of acquittal. Now that’s gone and trial calendars get clogged with cases that should have been resolved long ago. And prosecutors waste time and money dealing with them, too, instead of focusing on the ones that need more attention.

    There’s an old Army saying: “More sweat in training, less blood in combat.” The Kenosha County District Attorney’s office expends more blood in combat because of the lack of sweat in training. Experienced lawyers will tell you that many cases were settled because of the preliminary hearings after they heard from the witnesses (and sometimes defendants who may have been drunk or high at the time needed to hear what they did because they couldn’t remember).

    The district attorney’s notion is that by reducing preliminary hearings to the status of meaningless bobble-heads taxpayer money is being saved by not bringing in police officers and witnesses for preliminary hearings that are often waived. That’s foolish economy because even if the hearing is waived the prosecutor still has a chance to meet the people involved and size up the case plus it offers victims and witnesses a chance to give the prosecutor valuable insights. Yes, there are times when it’s a “slam dunk” case and the preliminary hearing would be a waste of time and, yes, it makes no sense to have someone from American Family drive here from Madison to just to say that they paid out $25,000 on a claim. But too much garbage stays in the system longer because of the lack of proper vetting that preliminary hearings used to offer. In that sense Mr. Cicchini is spot on. And he’s also correct that just because hearsay can be used at a preliminary hearing it doesn’t always mean that it’s proper evidence to be considered by the court.

    In order for hearsay to be admissible it should be “reliable.” And while the standard of proof at a preliminary hearing is probable cause the law also says that this level of probable cause may be higher than at the criminal complaint stage. For example, if the officer testifying says that “a witness told one of our officers that the defendant threw a brick at the window” that’s not reliable hearsay. Who said so? Why should they be believed?

    Now, imagine if the testifying officer said, “Sally Smith, who lives at 1234 Highway K, told Officer Dick Tracy that on November 2, 2022 at about 11:30 p.m., she brought her garbage can to the curb and looked across the street and saw the defendant throw a brick at the window of his ex-wife’s house and that she knew who he was because he used to live across the street before he got divorced and she met him several times.” Would that be more reliable as Sally Smith lives across the street, was standing outside when she saw the defendant throw a brick and knew who he was as a former neighbor that she’d met?

    At least one magistrate has occasionally tossed charges out because the hearsay was lacking reliability. Mr. Cicchini makes a very good point and perhaps more defense attorneys need to be prepared to properly argue when hearsay isn’t reliable and thus inadmissible. And the district attorney’s office may be squandering both resources and justice. They may think they’re saving money but experience teaches that it’s often the cheapskate that spends the most.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories
Archives
Authors

Subscribe to updates

Get notified of new articles. We'll never share your email address.