An In-Depth Look Into Rittenhouse’s Gun Charge

Copied!

The prosecution in the Kyle Rittenhouse case has worked hard to create the myth that Rittenhouse was illegally carrying a rifle; that his defense is a loophole which applies only to hunting. An examination of the legislative history of the law shows the prosecution is in error. 

Paid Advertisement

The statute, 948.60 is at the crux of the matter. While the title seems clear: “Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.”; the first section of the law explains the law does not apply to all weapons, but only certain, specific weapons which are defined in the law. 

Paid Advertisement

Most weapons are excluded from the definition. The law only regulates the possession of concealable weapons, and not all concealable weapons. 

Paid Advertisement

All weapons are “dangerous” or they are not considered weapons. The law only applies to the weapons listed. Knives are not included in the law. Bows and arrows are not included. Crossbows are not included. Blowguns are not included. Clubs are not included. Only concealable firearms are included. 

Paid Advertisement

Rifles and shotguns are excluded from the “any firearm, loaded or unloaded” by the exception in 3(c), except for short-barreled rifles and shotguns, which are unusual and concealable.  That has been the case in Wisconsin law since 1878. It is not a recent change, nor has it been limited to hunting.

Paid Advertisement

The legislative history of the law makes clear how this language evolved.

Paid Advertisement

Wisconsin first restricted the carry of concealed weapons in 1872

Wisconsin has had a long yet somewhat erratic tradition of gun ownership and use, whether for hunting, sport, or security. The state’s early settlers openly carried weapons as tools for sustenance and survival. Conversely, many other people condemned concealed weapons as tools of cowards and impulsive criminals, leading to their ban in Wisconsin in 1872.

The law only applied to certain weapons and excluded people who were carrying for self defense; in 1878 it was extended to all concealed weapons, without the self-defense exception, although the exception for “peace officers” was rather broad.

Wisconsin has a long history of treating concealed weapons differently from weapons which are not concealed. The theory has been that weapons which are carried openly are less of a threat. If people wish to avoid an armed person who is carrying openly, they can do so.  ADA Binger was trying to make a different point when he acknowledged this in the Rittenhouse hearing on 17 September, 2021:
..it is designed to deter people. It is designed to threaten others; to let them know, don’t mess with me, look what I’ve got.

In 1955, the law was codified in Wisconsin as statute section 941.23. In the same year, Wisconsin passed the precursor of the current age restriction statute (948.60), statute section 941.22. The statute prohibited people under the age of 18 from possessing pistols, defined as any firearm with a barrel length less than 12 inches. In other words, concealable firearms. 

There was an exception for pistols provided by parents for supervised target shooting.

In 1984, the legislature restricted unsupervised possession of all firearms outside of family owned land and unsupervised hunting outside of family land, by graduated age restrictions of persons under 16 years of age. Statute 29.227 restricted hunting and “possession and control” of firearms as separate issues.

1n 1987, the legislature expanded the restrictions on the possession of concealable weapons by those under 18, incorporating the previous law, 941.22, into the new designation of the current 948.60. It maintained the definition of firearms which are prohibited to people under the age of 18 as “any firearm having a barrel length of 12 inches or less, and added a list of unusual concealable weapons.

In 1991, the legislature moved the wording for concealable firearms from the definition to an exception which shows firearms which are not concealable are not included in the dangerous weapon definition. The age restriction scheme created in 1984 continued to apply.  The “any firearm with a barrel less than 12 inches” definition was retained. 

The moving of the language from the definition to an exception created a strange anomaly in the law. Short barreled rifles and shotguns are strictly regulated under both state and federal law. Rifles are considered short-barreled if the barrel is less than 16 inches. Shotguns are considered short barreled if the barrel is less than 18 inches. The exception in 948.60 appears to create an exception for persons under the age of 18; they can possess short barreled rifles and shotguns if the barrel is longer than 12 inches. 

In 1998, Wisconsin added the constitutional amendment protecting the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment makes clear the purposes of bearing arms include security and defense:

The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose.

In 2005, as legal short barreled rifles and shotguns became increasingly popular, the legislature clarified 948.60. The exception is changed from firearms which have a barrel length more than 12 inches, to rifles and shotguns which are not short barreled rifles and shotguns. The age restriction scheme for persons under the age of 16 remains in place.

The thrust of the law remains unchanged. Concealable firearms are included in the definition of what are considered dangerous weapons for people under the age of 18. People from 16 to 18 can possess and use (carry) rifles and shotguns, as long as they are not concealable. From age 18 to 21, people can openly carry concealable firearms as well as rifles and shotguns. Age 21 and older, people can obtain a permit to carry weapons concealed. 

There is no “hunting loophole” in the law. The law merely continues the long tradition in Wisconsin law of prohibiting people under the age of 18 from possessing certain concealable weapons. It maintains the age restriction scheme for openly carried firearms put in place in 1984, which only restricts people under the age of 16.

Author

Copied!
LATEST NEWS
Plus +

Kenosha Man Accused of Brutal Beating Given $2,500 Bail Despite Immigration Concerns

Victor Alfonso Lopez-Lopez, 32, of Kenosha In Court Friday(Photo by Kevin Mathewson, Kenosha County Eye) KENOSHA, Wis. – A 31-year-old Kenosha man accused of severely beating another man during a family gathering was given a $2,500 cash bail during his initial court appearance Friday. You must be logged in to view the rest of this article.  

Plus +

Kenosha Man Accused of Strangling 9-Year-Old Son, Threatening to Kill Him; Bail Set at $10,000

Coy W. Turner Jr., 37, of Kenosha In Court Today(Photo by Kevin Mathewson, Kenosha County Eye) KENOSHA, Wis. – A Kenosha man is accused of violently attacking his 9-year-old son during a domestic incident that left the child so traumatized he urinated in his pants out of fear. The father now faces felony charges and remains in custody after a court appearance Friday.

MORE TOP STORIES

Racine Man Faces Charges After Loaded Revolver Found During OWI Stop

KENOSHA, Wis. — A 25-year-old Racine man was given a $500 cash bond Friday after Kenosha County authorities say he was caught driving drunk with a loaded revolver under his seat — a weapon he allegedly possessed illegally as a convicted felon. Dylan Christian Rojas appeared in court before Court Commissioner Donald Bielski, who set the bail amount and scheduled a pre-trial conference for May 30. Prosecutors charged Rojas with three misdemeanors, including operating while intoxicated

Read More »

Racine Man Charged with 9th OWI, Cocaine Possession After Early Morning Traffic Stop in Kenosha

PLEASANT PRAIRIE, Wis. — A Racine man with a lengthy record of impaired driving is now facing his ninth offense after police allegedly found him under the influence of cocaine and in possession of multiple illegal substances during a traffic stop earlier this week. Daniel L. Vasko, 55, appeared in Kenosha County court on Friday, where Court Commissioner Donald Bielski set his bail at $25,000 cash. Vasko is charged with felony operating while under the influence—his

Read More »

Kenosha Woman Accused of Making False ‘Swatting’ Call Given Signature Bond

KENOSHA, Wis. — A 47-year-old Kenosha woman accused of making a false emergency report that drew nearly every patrol squad on duty was in court Friday, where a commissioner allowed her to sign herself out of jail without posting any cash. Danielle J. Barnes was charged with one felony count of false reporting of an emergency — commonly referred to as “swatting” — after allegedly telling dispatchers on May 4 that an armed man had forced

Read More »

Kenosha Man Charged in Fatal Crash That Left Two Families Shattered

KENOSHA, Wis. — The man accused of killing 46-year-old Amy Mosier in a high-speed drunk driving crash made his initial court appearance Thursday, as her grieving children made emotional pleas for justice—and a high bail. Peter K. Herrmann, 21, is charged with homicide by intoxicated use of a vehicle and injury by intoxicated use of a vehicle following the May 7 crash at Sheridan Road and 85th Street. Prosecutors say Herrmann plowed his Jeep Wrangler into

Read More »

Kenosha Man Recharged With Stalking, Defamation; DA Signals Renewed Focus on Criminal Defamation

KENOSHA, Wis. — A Mount Pleasant man is again facing serious charges in Kenosha County Circuit Court, accused of stalking, criminal defamation, and felony bail jumping in a re-filed case involving disturbing allegations of harassment. Dennis A. Thompson, 62, appeared in court Friday for an initial appearance in case number 2025CF597. The new charges stem from the same conduct alleged in a 2023 case — 2023CF1775 — that was dismissed after the complaining witness was not

Read More »

Neighbors Fume as City Lets Burned-Out Home Rot for Months in West-Kenosha Subdivision

KENOSHA, Wis. – A wind-tattered, illegible notice flaps on the front fence of a burned-out property in the 9400 block of 69th Street—an enduring symbol of inaction by the City of Kenosha, where residents say their concerns are being ignored. It has been nearly four months since a devastating house fire reduced the home to a foul-smelling pile of debris. Since then, neighbors in the Whitecaps subdivision say they’ve been left to live next to a

Read More »

Woman Accused of Biting Off Victim’s Ear in Bar Fight Held on $75,000 Bail

KENOSHA, Wis. — A 28-year-old Kenosha woman is facing multiple serious criminal charges after allegedly attacking another woman outside a neighborhood bar, a violent confrontation that reportedly included the use of pepper spray and biting off part of the woman’s ear. Dariana J. Shellie made her initial appearance in Kenosha County Circuit Court on Wednesday. Court Commissioner William Michel II set her cash bail at $75,000. She is scheduled to return to court for a preliminary

Read More »

Man Charged With Recklessly Endangering Officer After High-Speed Drunken Pursuit

KENOSHA, Wis. — A 36-year-old Kenosha man is facing felony charges after allegedly leading police on a high-speed pursuit through Pleasant Prairie on Tuesday and nearly striking a police sergeant with his vehicle. Alan E. Mintern was formally charged Wednesday in Kenosha County Circuit Court with first-degree recklessly endangering safety and hit-and-run involving an attended vehicle. Court Commissioner William Michel II set Mintern’s cash bail at $15,000. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for May 14. According

Read More »

Paddock Lake Cuts Ties with Salem Lakes Fire Department, Citing Cost Disputes and Transparency Issues

KENOSHA COUNTY, Wis. — After more than six decades of relying on Salem Lakes for emergency fire and medical services, the Village of Paddock Lake has officially ended its contract with the Salem Lakes Fire and Rescue Department. The decision, finalized by a vote of the Paddock Lake Village Board, shifts fire and EMS coverage to the Village of Bristol beginning in 2026—delivering a significant financial blow to Salem Lakes and raising questions about fiscal management

Read More »

Opinion: DA Graveley’s Sweetheart Deals for Brittany Mika Undermine Justice – It’s Time for a Reckoning

KENOSHA, Wis. – Brittany R. Mika, 31, has a criminal history that reads like a courtroom merry-go-round—except there’s nothing amusing about the danger she poses or the disgraceful leniency she has received under the former Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley. With about two dozen criminal cases and citations to her name, Mika has racked up a staggering list of offenses: violent outbursts, hate speech, resisting arrest, property destruction, illegal firearms possession, and serial violations of

Read More »
Categories
Archives
Authors

3 Responses

  1. The media and democrats are trying to make him guilty by media. Which in theory is working. Facts and evidence won’t matter. This case will strictly be media and political based. City don’t want more riots and media wants attention. He defended himself, but he’s already guilty by the media, there’s a reason Kenosha news and others ran the gaige suing the city so close to the trial, and so many times, hours apart. There’s an agenda and it isn’t fair.

    1. The Kenosha county Prosecutor a BLM lap dog and full time socalist has missteped this from the start. Myself a firearms instructor certified by NRA and USCCA Rittenhouse hit every justification of self defense according to Wisconsin law. Rittenhouse should have never been charged . Much like the Antifa and BLM people who burned down our city.

    2. I honestly don’t think any of the expert witnesses or etc. matters. It’s all posturing. Every person picked for this jury will know the story already from media accounts, etc.

      He isn’t going to be found guilty and that’s pretty much a guarantee.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST NEWS
Categories
Archives
Authors

Subscribe to updates

Get notified of new articles. We'll never share your email address.